Skip to content

Create v1.37 release directory and schedule#3016

Open
dipesh-rawat wants to merge 6 commits into
kubernetes:masterfrom
dipesh-rawat:create-v1.37-release-directory
Open

Create v1.37 release directory and schedule#3016
dipesh-rawat wants to merge 6 commits into
kubernetes:masterfrom
dipesh-rawat:create-v1.37-release-directory

Conversation

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What type of PR is this:

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Creates the v1.37 release directory with the initial release docs as per #3015.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is part of the initial setup for the v1.37 release cycle.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label May 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from cici37 May 12, 2026 23:02
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/release-team Issues or PRs related to the release-team subproject label May 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from jenshu May 12, 2026 23:02
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. needs-priority cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 12, 2026
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/cc katcosgrove fsmunoz

Comment thread OWNERS_ALIASES
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2026
@fsmunoz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fsmunoz commented May 13, 2026

/lgtm

Comment thread OWNERS_ALIASES Outdated
Comment thread OWNERS_ALIASES Outdated
Comment thread releases/release-1.37/README.md Outdated
The v1.37 release cycle is proposed as follows:

- **Monday 18th May 2026**: Week 1 — Release cycle begins
- **Thursday 11th June 2026 (AoE) / Friday 12th June 2026, 12:00 UTC**: Week 4 — [Production Readiness Freeze][Production Readiness Freeze]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v1.36 moved most deadlines (PRR, Enhancements, Code/Test Freeze) from Thursday AoE to Wednesday AoE based on a retro item, so the release team has Thursday/Friday to handle exceptions before the weekend. This PR uses Thursday AoE for PRR Freeze, Enhancements Freeze, and Code/Test Freeze. Was that intentional, or was this based on an older template?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah i think these freezes should be shifted a day earlier. 1.36 used Wed AoE (Thurs noon UTC)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing this out. I remembered this incorrectly that we used Wednesday AoE in the spring and winter releases to account for KubeCon EU/NA and allow time for exception handling.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat May 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve adjusted PRR Freeze and Enhancements Freeze to Tuesday AoE instead of Wednesday AoE to account for KubeCon India and the Juneteenth holiday, without shortening the development cycle by moving the deadlines a full week later.

addressed as part of commit 95c504d

Comment thread releases/release-1.37/README.md Outdated

- **Monday 18th May 2026**: Week 1 — Release cycle begins
- **Thursday 11th June 2026 (AoE) / Friday 12th June 2026, 12:00 UTC**: Week 4 — [Production Readiness Freeze][Production Readiness Freeze]
- **Thursday 18th June 2026 (AoE) / Friday 19th June 2026, 12:00 UTC**: Week 5 — [Enhancements Freeze][Enhancements Freeze]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

KubeCon India 2026 is June 18-19 in Mumbai, which overlaps directly with this deadline. The UTC cutoff (Friday June 19, 12:00 UTC) also falls on Juneteenth (US federal holiday). In v1.34, the Enhancement Freeze was shifted by a day specifically because of Juneteenth. Worth considering whether to adjust this date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat May 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve adjusted PRR Freeze and Enhancements Freeze to Tuesday AoE instead of Wednesday AoE to account for KubeCon India and the Juneteenth holiday, without shortening the development cycle by moving the deadlines a full week later.

addressed as part of commit 95c504d

Comment thread releases/release-1.37/README.md Outdated
Comment thread releases/release-1.37/links.md Outdated

## <a id="contacts"></a> Contacts

_To be updated_ No newline at end of file
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing trailing newline. Also, the README references rel.k8s.io/v137/feature-blogs in the Tracking docs section, but there is no feature-blogs anchor in this file. Consider adding a placeholder section for it (v1.36 had the same gap).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re: feature-blogs, searching past discussions reminded me that we don't always reliably populate this link. In 1.33 and 1.35 it pointed to the "Comms - Feature Blogs" view of the tracking board, but 1.34 and 1.36 didn't have such a shortlink (cc @dipesh-rawat in case you want to add it for 1.37)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the Tracking docs section, it duplicates the release links we maintain through links.md since the transition to rel.k8s.io. I replaced that section with a single link to links.md.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat May 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, dropped the separate feature-blogs link, since that just points to a view in the Enhancements board, which is already linked from links.md.

addressed as part of commit 95c504d

@katcosgrove
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold

Just to prevent an accidental merge before sufficient discussion and input. :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 15, 2026
@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat force-pushed the create-v1.37-release-directory branch from ecf6a0e to 95c504d Compare May 15, 2026 21:46
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 18, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dipesh-rawat, fsmunoz, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-team Issues or PRs related to the release-team subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants