feat: add LiteLLM as AI gateway provider#181
Open
RheagalFire wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
litellm.completion()BaseLLM+ LlamaIndexCustomLLMpattern as existing providers (OpenRouter, DeepSeek, etc.)Prior art
No prior LiteLLM PRs, issues, or discussions in this repo.
Changes
src/pygpt_net/provider/llms/litellm.py- newLiteLLMProvider(BaseLLM)+LiteLLMIndex(CustomLLM)that callslitellm.completion()directly withdrop_params=Truefor cross-provider compatibilitysrc/pygpt_net/app.py- registeredLiteLLMProvidervialauncher.add_llm()pyproject.toml- addedlitellm>=1.55,<2.0Usage
Testing
14 live E2E tests against Azure AI Foundry via litellm.completion(), covering every code path:
Results: 14 passed, 0 failed
Risk / Compatibility