wip ray version update#11184
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
|
/ok-to-test |
1e63f8e to
34c7ce3
Compare
|
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-35 |
|
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-34 |
|
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-34 |
2936589 to
a61ee2b
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mszadkow The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-35 |
|
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-35 |
|
@mszadkow: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Added .RayStartParam(rayv1.HeadNode, "object-store-memory", "100000000") to both failing InTreeAutoscaling RayJob tests. This limits GCS object store memory to 100MB, reducing GCS load so worker raylets can register within the 30-second timeout — matching the fix already present in the passing RayService InTreeAutoscaling test.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?