feat: get loop from Future instead of context-local storage

[BobTheBuidler]

What do these changes do?

This should be faster on the benchmarks, not sure though.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

None

Related issue number

N/A

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.22%. Comparing base (0654124) to head (e2f4e49).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #712   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.22%   97.22%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         793      793           
  Branches       41       41           
=======================================
  Hits          771      771           
  Misses         20       20           
  Partials        2        2           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	95.83% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #712 will not alter performance

_{Comparing BobTheBuidler:patch-5 (e2f4e49) with master (0654124)}

Summary

✅ 63 untouched
⏩ 4 skipped¹

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩